Ferguson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ferguson v. State

669 So. 2d 1148, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2846, 1996 WL 124701

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 669 So. 2d 1148 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1148, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2846, 1996 WL 124701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. While the trial court found the motion to be untimely, which we find it was not, a review of the record proves that the motion was a successive Rule 3.850 motion and that the points raised in this second motion were either raised on direct appeal, or could have been, or were raised in the first motion for relief.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. While the trial court found the motion to be untimely, which we find it was not, a review of the record proves that the motion was a successive Rule 3.850 motion and that the points raised in this second motion were either raised on direct appeal, or could have been, or were raised in the first motion for relief.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 So. 2d 1148, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2846, 1996 WL 124701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack