Ferguson v. Ferguson

472 So. 2d 767, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14948
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferguson v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 504 So. 2d 541
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 1985·No. No. 84-948·Published

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

We affirm the final judgment in this dissolution of marriage case except as to the award of exclusive possession of the jointly owned marital home to the husband, which portion of the judgment we reverse. Neither party was awarded alimony, so such award of exclusive possession was not directly connected to a support obligation. Neither was there any evidence or finding that such possession was necessary to prevent reduction in the value of the property or to serve any special purpose. Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So.2d 949 (Fla.1980); Cone v. Cone, 449 So.2d 867 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). We find no merit to appellant’s remaining issues nor to the issue raised on appellee’s cross-appeal.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., and HAMMOND, K.C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Ferguson, 472 So. 2d 767, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

472 So. 2d 767 (Ferguson v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. Duncan
379 So. 2d 949 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cone v. Cone
449 So. 2d 867 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)