Ferguson v. Ferguson
This text of 423 So. 2d 509 (Ferguson v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The post-decretal order awarding attorney’s fees in this cause is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the trial court specifically retained jurisdiction in the final judgment of marriage dissolution to set an attorney’s fee for the wife Carmeline Agnes Ferguson and determined thereby that the said wife was entitled to such a fee; and (b) the death of the wife subsequent to the entry of the above final judgment of marriage dissolution did not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to take testimony as to the amount of the attorney’s fee owed and to enter the order appealed from. See Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So.2d 855 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dism., 317 So.2d 76 (Fla.1975); see also Valparaiso Bank & Trust Co. v. Sims, 343 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 353 So.2d 678 (Fla.1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 So. 2d 509, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-ferguson-fladistctapp-1982.