FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY N/K/A BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 8, 2022
DocketA23A0250
StatusPublished

This text of FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY N/K/A BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY (FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY N/K/A BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY N/K/A BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 08, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0250. FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY n/k/a BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY.

Ferdinand Farley, Sr., (“Farley”) filed a petition for declaratory judgment seeking clarification of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) entered following his divorce from Brenda Parham Farley n/k/a Brenda Parham Murray. The trial court entered an order finding the QDRO unambiguous, and Farley appeals.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction. Appeals from “judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be made by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). And “where, as here, the underlying subject matter of a lawsuit relates to such rights and obligations [arising from a divorce decree], and the parties are the ex-spouses . . . , the case involves domestic relations and compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 is the exclusive means by which to appeal the final order in the action.” Walker v. Estate of Mays, 279 Ga. 652, 653 (1) (619 SE2d 679) (2005). “The fact that the particular vehicle used to obtain the judgment was an action for declaratory judgment makes no difference because the subject matter was domestic relations and the judgment is one entered in a domestic relations case.” Weaver v. Jones, 260 Ga. 493, 493-494 (2) (396 SE2d 890) (1990).

1 Farley appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter to this Court. See Case No. S22A1284 (Aug. 9, 2022). Farley’s failure to follow the requisite procedure deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Yanes v. Escobar, 362 Ga. App. 896, 898 (870 SE2d 506) (2022). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/08/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Estate of Mays
619 S.E.2d 679 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Weaver v. Jones
396 S.E.2d 890 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FERDINAND FARLEY, SR. v. BRENDA PARHAM FARLEY N/K/A BRENDA PARHAM MURRAY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferdinand-farley-sr-v-brenda-parham-farley-nka-brenda-parham-murray-gactapp-2022.