Fennick v. Kittredge
This text of 953 N.E.2d 187 (Fennick v. Kittredge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin Fennick appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, in which he sought relief from one or more orders of the Superior Court. The single justice correctly denied extraordinary relief, as Fennick had an adequate remedy in the ordinary appellate process, namely, a direct appeal to the Appeals Court from any final judgment. “Our general superintendence power under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is extraordinary and to be exercised sparingly, not as a substitute for the normal appellate process or merely to provide an additional layer of appellate review after the normal process has run its course.” Votta v. Police Dep’t of Billerica, 444 Mass. 1001, 1001 (2005).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
953 N.E.2d 187, 460 Mass. 1012, 2011 Mass. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fennick-v-kittredge-mass-2011.