Fenney v. Fenney

537 S.W.2d 367, 259 Ark. 858, 1976 Ark. LEXIS 2157
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 7, 1976
Docket76-51
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 537 S.W.2d 367 (Fenney v. Fenney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fenney v. Fenney, 537 S.W.2d 367, 259 Ark. 858, 1976 Ark. LEXIS 2157 (Ark. 1976).

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Roberta Z. Fenney having been granted a divorce from appellee William C. Fenney appeals from the trial court’s holding that she was not entitled to one-third of her husband’s Air Force retirement pay. We affirm the trial court.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Repl. 1962) provides that a wife who is granted a divorce “shall be entitled to one-third [1/3] of the husband’s personal property absolutely, and one-third [1 /3] of all the lands whereof her husband was seized of an estate of inheritance at any time during the marriage for her life, ...”

We do not consider the right to receive retirement pay from the armed forces to be personal property within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214, supra. The right to a pension and retirement pay, not yet due and payable, cannot be assigned, sold, transferred, conveyed or pledged. See In re Marriage of Ellis, 538 P. 2d 1347 (Colo. App. 1975).

Appellant relies upon cases from community property states, such as Ramsey v. Ramsey, 96 Idaho 672, 535 P. 2d 53 (1975), and Miser v. Miser, 475 S.W. 2d 597 (Tex. Civ. App. 1971), to support her position. For the reasons stated in In re Marriage of Ellis, supra, we do not find the decisions from the community property states to be persuasive. In effect, the community property jurisdictions treat armed forces’ retirement pay as alimony; otherwise, it is not collectible, 42 U.S.C. § 659 (Supp. IV, 1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. Greene
751 P.2d 827 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1988)
Stemper v. Stemper
403 N.W.2d 405 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Glass v. Glass
344 N.W.2d 677 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen
331 N.W.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1983)
Cochran v. Cochran
644 S.W.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1983)
McMurtray v. McMurtray
629 S.W.2d 285 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1982)
Bachman v. Bachman
621 S.W.2d 701 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
McCarty v. McCarty
453 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Premium Financing Specialists, Inc. v. Lindsey
11 B.R. 135 (E.D. Arkansas, 1981)
Ex Parte Burson
615 S.W.2d 192 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Hill v. Hill
424 A.2d 779 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1981)
Linson v. Linson
618 P.2d 748 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1980)
Baker v. Baker
421 A.2d 998 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1980)
Paulsen v. Paulsen
601 S.W.2d 873 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1980)
Russell v. Russell
605 S.W.2d 33 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1980)
Gross v. Gross
585 S.W.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)
In Re Marriage of Musser
388 N.E.2d 1289 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)
Cose v. Cose
592 P.2d 1230 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1979)
Kroha v. Kroha
578 S.W.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 S.W.2d 367, 259 Ark. 858, 1976 Ark. LEXIS 2157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenney-v-fenney-ark-1976.