Felton v. Felton
This text of 34 A. 312 (Felton v. Felton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of this record has failed to convince us that there was any error “ in discharging the rule to set aside the sheriff’s sale.” It has been uniformly held that mere inadequacy of price, without more, is not sufficient ground for setting aside a sheriff’s sale: Hollister v. Vanderlin, 165 Pa. 248; Cake v. Cake, 156 Pa. 47. There is nothing to show that, in discharging the rule to show cause, there was any abuse of that discretion with which the court below is invested. Further discussion of the subject is unnecessary. We are all of opinion that no sufficient ground for reversal has been shown.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 312, 175 Pa. 44, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felton-v-felton-pa-1896.