Cake v. Cake
26 A. 781, 156 Pa. 47, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1309
Opinion
We find nothing in this record to warrant either reversal or modification of the order complained of. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.
Order affirmed, with costs to be paid by J. W. Cake.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cake v. Cake, 26 A. 781, 156 Pa. 47, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1309 (Pa. 1893).
26 A. 781 (Cake v. Cake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LANSDOWNE BY LANSDOWNE v. GC Murphy Co.
517 A.2d 1318 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Santilli v. Church
33 Pa. D. & C.2d 309 (Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 1964)
Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. Winowich
187 A. 481 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Plummer v. Wilson
185 A. 311 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Schekter v. Katler
95 Pa. Super. 226 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Weaver v. Henninger
1 Pa. D. & C. 167 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1921)
Appeal of Laird
2 Pa. Super. 300 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Felton v. Felton
34 A. 312 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)