Felton v. Albemarle Regional Health Services

District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided June 7, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00014·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION No. 2:20-CV-14-D □

ANGELA FELTON ) and ARTHUR FELTON, ) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ALBEMARLE REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., ) Defendants.

On May 6, 2020, this court dismissed Angela Felton and Arthur Felton’s (“Feltons” or “plaintiffs”) claims and closed the case. See [D.E. 34]. On July 27, 2020, the Feltons moved to correct clerical errors. See [D.E. 45]. The same day, the Feltons moved to compel Rule 26(a) disclosures. See [D.E. 46]. On August 31, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II denied as futile the Feltons’s motion to amend their complaint. See [D.E. 49]. On October 5, November 10, and November 30, 2020, the Feltons moved to provide additional information to the court. See [D.E. 51, 52, 53]. On December 29, 2020, this court denied the Feltons’s motion to amend, and denied the Feltons’s remaining motions as baseless [D.E. 54]. The Feltons did not appeal. On April 21, 2021, the Feltons filed a motion for relief [D.E. 55]. To the extent the Feltons seek reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, the motion is untimely, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); cf. Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat’] Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382 (4th Cir. 1995).

To the extent the Feltons seek relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the court denies the motion as baseless. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 500-01 & n.3 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc); Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 412 n.12 (4th Cir. 2010); Nat’l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. Gray, 1 F.3d 262, 264 (4th Cir. 1993); cf. Luxama v. McHugh, 675 F. App’x 272, 273 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished). The court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for relief [D.E. 55] as baseless. The case remains closed. SO ORDERED. This _1_ day of June 2021.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton v. Albemarle Regional Health Services, (E.D.N.C. 2021).

Felton v. Albemarle Regional Health Services (Felton v. Albemarle Regional Health Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLC
599 F.3d 403 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Aikens v. Ingram
652 F.3d 496 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Bogart v. Chapell
396 F.3d 548 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
Paul Luxama v. John McHugh
675 F. App'x 272 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Hughes v. Bedsole
48 F.3d 1376 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
Zinkand v. Brown
478 F.3d 634 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)