Feller v. Lear Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Feller v. Lear Corp.

101 S.W.3d 286, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2485, 2002 WL 31866236

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 24, 2002

DocketNo. ED 81251

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.W.3d 286 (Feller v. Lear Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feller v. Lear Corp., 101 S.W.3d 286, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2485, 2002 WL 31866236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lear Corporation and Zurich Insurance Company appeal from a Final Award Allowing Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying an Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in favor of Gary Feller (Employee). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s Final Award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Sutton v. Vee Jay Cement Contracting Co., 37 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). Further, the Commission did not act without or in excess of its powers in awarding Employee temporary total disability benefits. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lear Corporation and Zurich Insurance Company appeal from a Final Award Allowing Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying an Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in favor of Gary Feller (Employee). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s Final Award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Sutton v. Vee Jay Cement Contracting Co., 37 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). Further, the Commission did not act without or in excess of its powers in awarding Employee temporary total disability benefits. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.W.3d 286, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2485, 2002 WL 31866236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feller-v-lear-corp-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack