Felker v. Malcolm

1 S.E.2d 753, 187 Ga. 628, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 449
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 23, 1939·No. No. 12677·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

The briefs hied by the plaintiff in error contained statements indicating that this case was settled after rendition of the judgment complained of. In the circumstances, a rule nisi was issued by this court and notice given thereof by mail to the attorneys for each of the parties, calling upon them to inform the court as to whether the ease had been settled, and, if so, to show why it should not be dismissed as having become moot, the rule being made returnable February 6, 1939. The attorneys for each of the defendants in error having responded with statements showing that the case has been settled, and no response having been made by the plaintiff in error, it will be presumed that the statements made in behalf of the defendants in error are true. Treating them as true, the issues presented have become moot, and the writ of error should be dismissed. Haygood v. Stone, 164 Ga. 734 (139 S. E. 426); Earle v. Muse, 182 Ga. 492 (185 S. E. 799).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felker v. Malcolm, 1 S.E.2d 753, 187 Ga. 628, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 449 (Ga. 1939).

1 S.E.2d 753 (Felker v. Malcolm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Lawrence
25 S.E.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)