Earle v. Muse
Opinion
A petition praying for injunction against the construction and operation of a public ginnery, on the ground that it would constitute a nuisance to the plaintiff and his family, was dismissed on general demurrer, and the plaintiff excepted. No supersedeas [493]*493was granted. The petition was filed on June 19, 1935, and the order sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action was rendered on July 8, 1935. For reasons deemed sufficient, a rule nisi was issued on April 13, 1936, calling on counsel for the plaintiff in error to show cause, on April 18, 1936, why the writ of error should not be dismissed because the question involved was moot. No response having been made to the rule, it will be presumed that the issues are moot, Haygood v. Stone, 164 Ga. 734 (139 S. E. 426).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
185 S.E. 799 (Earle v. Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.