Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

998 N.E.2d 514, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1417

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 2013

Docket2013-1746

StatusPublished

This text of 998 N.E.2d 514 (Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc., 998 N.E.2d 514, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1417 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98985, 2013-Ohio-3523. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Cary Silverman, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 98985, 2013-Ohio-3523. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Cary Silverman, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

998 N.E.2d 514, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-v-ganley-chevrolet-inc-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack