Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.

3 N.E.3d 1215, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1413

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 2014

Docket2013-1746

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.E.3d 1215 (Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc., 3 N.E.3d 1215, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98985, 2013-Ohio-3523. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

O’Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill through VI. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Upon consideration of the motion of appellants to strike portions of the memorandum in response, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the memorandum in response is stricken. Appellees shall file a memorandum in response that is compliant with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and the Rules of Professional Conduct within three days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 98985, 2013-Ohio-3523. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

O’Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill through VI. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Upon consideration of the motion of appellants to strike portions of the memorandum in response, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the memorandum in response is stricken. Appellees shall file a memorandum in response that is compliant with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and the Rules of Professional Conduct within three days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.E.3d 1215, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-v-ganley-chevrolet-inc-ohio-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack