Felix v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 19, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00891·Unknown

Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN FELIX, Case No.: 19cv891-W(MSB)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART JOINT 13 v. MOTION TO CONTINUE ALL DISCOVERY AND RELATED DEADLINES BY SIXTY 14 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., DAYS [ECF NO. 29] 15 Defendants. 16 17 On March 18, 2020, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Extend All Discovery and 18 Related Deadlines by Sixty (60) Days.” (ECF No. 29.) In support, they contend that 19 written fact discovery has been completed, and the only outstanding fact discovery 20 concerns depositions of the individual Defendants, one San Diego Police Officer, and 21 Plaintiff’s fiancée. (Id. at 3.) The parties further state that the City of San Diego’s 22 operations have been significantly impacted by the ongoing public health crisis, “[a]ll 23 City buildings have been closed to the general public, and direction has been given to 24 focus on essential City services which include Police, Fire, Water, Wastewater and Trash 25 Disposal. (Id.) They further maintain that “[i]n order to promote the health, safety and 26 wellbeing of all involved, the parties agree to postpone the remaining fact witness 27 depositions until a time where meetings and travel are not discouraged by our local, 2 PART the motion. Having consulted with the chambers of District Judge Whelan, the 3 Court amends its Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial 4 Proceedings as follows: 5 1. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties on or before June 2, 6 2020. “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of 7 Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient 8 period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off 9 date, taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the 10 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 11 Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all 12 discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). All discovery motions must be 13 filed within 30 days of the event giving rise to the dispute. For oral discovery, the event 14 giving rise to the dispute is the completion of the transcript of the relevant portion of 15 the deposition. For written discovery, the event giving rise to the discovery dispute is 16 the date of service of the response, not the date on which counsel reach an impasse in 17 meet and confer efforts. If a party fails to provide a discovery response, the event giving 18 rise to the discovery dispute is the date response was due. 19 The Court’s procedures for resolving discovery disputes are set forth in Magistrate 20 Judge Michael S. Berg’s Civil Chambers Rules, which are posted on the Court’s website. 21 A failure to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. 22 Absent an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement 23 will be recognized by the court. 24 2. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by June 5, 25 2020. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A), the parties must identify any person who 26 may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. 27 Evid. This requirement is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of 2 testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal rates 3 the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. 4 3. By July 17, 2020, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions in 5 Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 6 requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 7 testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 8 expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 9 make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 10 evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, 11 the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 12 4. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or 13 rebuttal evidence under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e) by 14 July 31, 2020. 15 5. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by August 28, 2020. 16 The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing 17 fact discovery. 18 6. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 19 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 20 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 21 7. All other pretrial motions must be filed by September 25, 2020. Counsel 22 for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge 23 who will hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion 24 date and the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan 25 accordingly. Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the 26 motion not being heard. Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, 27 or as otherwise set by the district judge. 2 2020, at 9:30 a.m., in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg located at 221 3 West Broadway, Suite 3145, San Diego, CA 92101. All discussions at the Mandatory 4 Settlement Conference will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. 5 Counsel for any non-English speaking party is responsible for arranging for the 6 appearance of an interpreter at the conference. 7 a. Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All named parties, party 8 representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as the 9 principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present in person and legally 10 and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel appearing without their 11 clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be cause for 12 immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the immediate termination of 13 the conference. 14 b. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative 15 with full settlement authority1 must be present at the conference. Retained outside 16 corporate counsel shall not appear on behalf of a corporation as the party 17 representative who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a settlement. A 18 government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as the government 19 attorney who attends the Mandatory Settlement Conference has (1) primary 20 responsibility for handling the case, and (2) authority to negotiate and recommend 21 settlement offers to the government official(s) having ultimate settlement authority. 22

23 1 “Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be 24 authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms 25 acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felix v. City of San Diego, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Felix v. City of San Diego (Felix v. City of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)