Felicie v. James

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BOBBY FELICIE, Plaintiff, -against- 24-CV-7446 (KMW) LETITIA JAMES STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL; CHELSEA JOHN DIVISION OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL HUMAN RIGHTS REGIONAL DIRECTOR; LATASHA BROWN SUPREME COURT CLERK, Defendants. KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: By Order dated May 19, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with 30 days’ leave to replead his claims in an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) That Order stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2025 New York, New York /s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge