Feldman v. Himmelstein
243 A.D. 723, 277 N.Y.S. 1002
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1935·Published
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action upon a non-negotiable promissory note affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 272.) Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for reargument dismissed as not appealable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feldman v. Himmelstein, 243 A.D. 723, 277 N.Y.S. 1002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
243 A.D. 723 (Feldman v. Himmelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curry v. MacKenzie
146 N.E. 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)