Feldman v. Himmelstein
This text of 243 A.D. 723 (Feldman v. Himmelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action upon a non-negotiable promissory note affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 272.) Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for reargument dismissed as not appealable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 723, 277 N.Y.S. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-himmelstein-nyappdiv-1935.