Feldman v. Himmelstein
This text of 242 A.D. 780 (Feldman v. Himmelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed. In our opinion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 780, 275 N.Y.S. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-himmelstein-nyappdiv-1934.