Feldman v. Himmelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldman v. Himmelstein

242 A.D. 780, 275 N.Y.S. 346

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed. In our opinion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed. In our opinion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Feldman v. Himmelstein, 242 A.D. 780, 275 N.Y.S. 346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 780 (Feldman v. Himmelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.