Feldman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x

PETER FELDMAN,

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 22-CV-6262 (EK)(ST) -against-

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR NOTE HOLDERS AND THE NOTE INSURER OF INDEX 2006-AR27; PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION D/B/A PHH MORTGAGE SERVICING, GOLDEN FIRST MORTGAGE CORP., “JOHN DOE ENTITY” 1 THROUGH “JOHN DOE ENTITY” 6,

Defendants.

------------------------------------x

ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: The Court has received Magistrate Judge Tiscione’s Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated February 12, 2025. ECF No. 63. Judge Tiscione recommends that the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint be denied without prejudice. Neither party has filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court reviews Judge Tiscione’s recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition; accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968 F. Supp. 2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). Having reviewed the record, I find no error and therefore adopt the R&R in its entirety. Thus, the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is denied without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eric Komitee ERIC KOMITEE United State s District Judge

Dated: February 27, 2025 Brooklyn, New York