Fein v. Johnson Wales University

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fein v. Johnson Wales University

963 So. 2d 812, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11790, 2007 WL 2188172

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2007

DocketNo. 3D06-1175

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 So. 2d 812 (Fein v. Johnson Wales University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fein v. Johnson Wales University, 963 So. 2d 812, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11790, 2007 WL 2188172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

The appellant (“Fein”) appeals the granting of a final summary judgment in favor of Johnson & Wales University.

As no reversible legal error has been demonstrated and there were no genuine issues of material fact remaining to be resolved by the trial court, we affirm the granting of the summary judgment below. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); Reflex, N.V. v. UMET Trust, 336 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); David Props., Inc. v. Selk, 151 So.2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c). The orders below denying Fein’s motion for leave to amend to assert a punitive damages claim and motion for sanctions and the entry of a final cost judgment are likewise affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, J.

The appellant (“Fein”) appeals the granting of a final summary judgment in favor of Johnson & Wales University.

As no reversible legal error has been demonstrated and there were no genuine issues of material fact remaining to be resolved by the trial court, we affirm the granting of the summary judgment below. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); Reflex, N.V. v. UMET Trust, 336 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); David Props., Inc. v. Selk, 151 So.2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c). The orders below denying Fein’s motion for leave to amend to assert a punitive damages claim and motion for sanctions and the entry of a final cost judgment are likewise affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 So. 2d 812, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11790, 2007 WL 2188172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fein-v-johnson-wales-university-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack