Cimbler v. Brent
This text of 963 So. 2d 812 (Cimbler v. Brent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Saul CIMBLER, Appellant,
v.
Wes BRENT, etc., et al., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Saul Cimbler, in proper person.
*813 Heller and Chames and Jonathan Heller, Miami, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Saul Cimbler, seeks review of a non-final order granting a motion to discharge a lis pendens. The primary purpose of appellant's lawsuit is to recover money damages and the action does not directly affect the title to or the right of possession of real property. We have held that in the absence of a duly recorded instrument where there is no "direct claim cognizable under the law against or upon the . . . property burdened by the lis pendens . . ., no lis pendens may be asserted under any conditions against the realty. . . ." Sunrise Point v. Foss, 373 So.2d 438, 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See also Ness Racquet Club, LLC v. Renzi Holdings, Inc., 959 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Because of our decision, we do not reach the other grounds raised on appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
963 So. 2d 812, 2007 WL 2188649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cimbler-v-brent-fladistctapp-2007.