Fedor v. Ribicoff
This text of 211 F. Supp. 520 (Fedor v. Ribicoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph E. FEDOR
v.
Abraham A. RIBICOFF, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America.
United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.
W. J. Krencewicz, Shenandoah, Pa., for plaintiff.
Drew J. T. O'Keefe, Merna P. Bearman, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
In this matter, an appeal from a disallowance of a social security claim, plaintiff has moved for default judgment on the ground that the defendant has failed for more than a reasonable time to file an answer.
F.R.Civ.P. 55(e) provides: "No judgment by default shall be entered against the United States or an officer or agency thereof unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court." Clearly, mere failure on the part of the United States to answer is no ground for entry of judgment against it. If plaintiff proceeds to establish his claim, and then satisfies the court as to waiver of sovereign immunity and service on the defendant, judgment may be entered against the defendant despite failure to appear. Cf. Rank v. (Krug) United States, 142 F.Supp. 1, (S.D.Cal., 1956). Having filed only his complaint, plaintiff's motion must be denied as premature.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 F. Supp. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fedor-v-ribicoff-paed-1962.