Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.

348 U.S. 940, 99 L. Ed. 736, 75 S. Ct. 361, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 1955 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,956
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 14, 1955·No. No. 80·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The Court finds that the order of the Commission is not ambiguous. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it modified paragraph 1 (c) of the Commission's order, is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to restore the order of the Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., 348 U.S. 940, 99 L. Ed. 736, 75 S. Ct. 361, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 1955 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,956 (1955).

348 U.S. 940 (Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
970 F.2d 311 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Articles of Drug
633 F. Supp. 316 (D. Nebraska, 1986)
United States v. Sene X Eleemosynary Corp., Inc.
479 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Florida, 1979)
Floersheim v. Weinburger
346 F. Supp. 950 (District of Columbia, 1972)
United States v. Standard Distributors, Inc.
267 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Illinois, 1967)
Giant Food Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
322 F.2d 977 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
State v. Mastrian
122 N.W.2d 621 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1963)
Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.
216 F. Supp. 670 (S.D. New York, 1963)
Bakers Franchise Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
302 F.2d 258 (Third Circuit, 1962)
Worley v. Dunn
252 F.2d 712 (Sixth Circuit, 1958)