Home/Supreme Court/Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.

Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.

348 U.S. 940, 99 L. Ed. 736, 75 S. Ct. 361, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 1955 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,956
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 14, 1955
DocketNo. 80
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 348 U.S. 940 (Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., 348 U.S. 940, 99 L. Ed. 736, 75 S. Ct. 361, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 1955 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,956 (1955).

Opinion

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The Court finds that the order of the Commission is not ambiguous. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it modified paragraph 1 (c) of the Commission's order, is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to restore the order of the Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
970 F.2d 311 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished Devices
714 F. Supp. 1159 (D. Utah, 1989)
United States v. Articles of Drug
633 F. Supp. 316 (D. Nebraska, 1986)
United States v. Sene X Eleemosynary Corp., Inc.
479 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Florida, 1979)
National Commission on Egg Nutrition and Richard Weiner, Inc., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission
570 F.2d 157 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
Floersheim v. Weinburger
346 F. Supp. 950 (District of Columbia, 1972)
Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc., Stephen Corporation, Vincent Melzac v. Federal Trade Commission
425 F.2d 583 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Standard Distributors, Inc.
267 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Illinois, 1967)
Giant Food Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
322 F.2d 977 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
State v. Mastrian
122 N.W.2d 621 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1963)
Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.
216 F. Supp. 670 (S.D. New York, 1963)
Bakers Franchise Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
302 F.2d 258 (Third Circuit, 1962)
Bakers Franchise Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
302 F.2d 258 (Third Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Article of Device Consisting of 24 Devices, More or Less
202 F. Supp. 147 (D. New Jersey, 1962)
Mrs. Charlotte L. Worley, Adm'x, and C. H. Worley, Jr., a Minor v. Ross v. Dunn, Trustee, (Three Cases). Mrs. Charlotte L. Worley, Adm'x, and C. H. Worley, Jr., a Minor v. First American National Bank, Mrs. Charlotte L. Worley, Adm'x, and C. H. Worley, Jr., a Minor v. Robert W. Sturdivant
252 F.2d 712 (First Circuit, 1958)
Worley v. Dunn
252 F.2d 712 (Sixth Circuit, 1958)
James H. Sewell, Doing Business Under the Fictitious Firm Name and Style of Burns Cuboid Company v. Federal Trade Commission
240 F.2d 228 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 U.S. 940, 99 L. Ed. 736, 75 S. Ct. 361, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 1955 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-trade-commission-v-rhodes-pharmacal-co-scotus-1955.