Federal Trade Commission v. MOBE Ltd.

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided July 2, 2024·No. 6:18-cv-00862·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 6:18-cv-862-RBD-DCI

MOBE LTD.; MOBEPROCESSING.COM; TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT USA, INC.; MOBETRAINING.COM, INC.; 9336-0311 QUEBEC INC.; MOBE PRO LIMITED; MOBE INC.; MOBE ONLINE LTD.; MATT LLOYD PUBLISHING.COM PTY LTD.; MATTHEW LLOYD MCPHEE; SUSAN ZANGHI; and INGRID WHITNEY,

Defendants. ____________________________________

ORDER Before the Court are four motions by the Receiver. (Docs. 296–99.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant three of the motions (Docs. 296–98) and grant in part the fourth (Doc. 299). (Doc. 300 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 300) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a

part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Receiver’s First and Final Application for Authority to Pay the Rehmann Group for Accounting Services Rendered (Doc. 296) is

GRANTED. The Receiver is authorized to pay Rehmann Group $20,410.00 in fees. 3. Receiver’s Verified Sixth and Final Application for Payment for Services Rendered by Akerman LLP (Doc. 297) is GRANTED. The

Receiver is authorized to pay Akerman $3,750.00 in fees. 4. Receiver’s Verified Eighth and Final Application for Payment for Services Rendered (Doc. 298) is GRANTED. The Receiver is

authorized payment in the amount of $6,006.00 in fees. 5. Receiver’s Final Report, Concerning Winding Up the Receivership, and Unopposed Motion to Conclude Receivership and Discharge

Receiver (Doc. 299) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: a. The motion is GRANTED in that the Receiver is DIRECTED to pay the balance of funds in his possession to

Plaintiff. Upon a Report from the Receiver verifying completion of this and all the payments listed above, the Court will discharge the Receiver. b. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on July 2, 2024.

ROY B. DALTON, United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Trade Commission v. MOBE Ltd., (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Federal Trade Commission v. MOBE Ltd. (Federal Trade Commission v. MOBE Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.
208 F. App'x 781 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)