Federal Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

24 B.T.A. 622, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1613
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 5, 1931
DocketDocket No. 27855.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 B.T.A. 622 (Federal Oil Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Oil Corp. v. Commissioner, 24 B.T.A. 622, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1613 (bta 1931).

Opinion

OPINION.

Lansdon:

This is a proceeding under section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The respondent has asserted that the petitioner is liable at law or in equity for the payment of deficiencies in income and excess-profits taxes due from the Federal Oil Company for 1920, 1921 and 1922, in the respective amounts of $174,926.64, $49,226.15, and $4,414.45. At the hearing the parties stipulated that in case the Board should find the petitioner liable as transferee of assets of the taxpayer, the correct tax liability is $9,345.81 for 1920 and no [623]*623deficiencies for 1921 and 1922. It is also stipulated that the petitioner received assets of the taxpayer having a value in excess of $9,345.81, plus interest thereon as provided by law, which leaves for determination only the question whether it is liable at law or in equity as transferee of assets of the taxpayer. Under the pleadings we are also called upon to determine whether assessment and collection of the deficiency asserted is barred by the statute of limitations.

The facts are presented in a stipulation, with exhibits attached thereto, which constitute the only evidence offered. In this report we shall summarize the stipulation and quote only the material portions of the exhibits, but the stipulation and exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference as a part of this report.

The petitioner is a corporation, organized on September 4, 1924, under the laws of Virginia, with an office at Eureka, Kans. Shortly thereafter it acquired the assets of the Federal Oil Company, a Delaware corporation, organized in 1911, which also had offices at Eureka, Kans. The parties agree that the original contracts by which such acquisition occurred have been lost, but that the purport thereof is reflected in the corporate minutes, which are attached as an exhibit to the stipulation of facts. The first mention of the Federal Oil Company in the corporate minutes of petitioner is under date of September 11, 1924, and as follows:

Resolved that the agreement heretofore made on behalf of this Corporation by R. C. Megargel & Co. with the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Federal Oil Company (a Delaware Corporation) that this Corporation, when organized, should acquire all the property and assets of said Federal Oil Company in exchange for two thousand, two hundred and thirty-three (2,233) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the preferred stock of this Corporation of the par value of One Hundred Dollars ($100) each and for fifty thousand, five hundred and ninety-two (50,592) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the common stock of this Corporation without par value, be and it hereby is approved and adopted for this Corporation.
Resolved that the property and assets of Federal Oil Company (a Delaware Corporation) to be sold and transferred to this Corporation as aforesaid, are in the judgment of the Board of Directors of this Corporation of the full and fair value, in current money of the United States, of Two Hundred Seventy Three Thousand, Eight Hundred Ninety-two Dollars ($273,892) over and, above the liabilities of said Federal Oil Company.
Resolved that the proper officers of this Corporation be and they hereby are authorized and directed to issue and deliver to or upon the order of the said Federal Oil Company against a proper conveyance and delivery to this Corporation of all the assets and property of said Federal Oil Company, certificates representing two thousand, two hundred and thirty-three (2,233) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the preferred stock of this Corporation of the par value of One Hundred Dollars ($100) each and fifty thousand, five hundred and ninety-two (50,592) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the common stock of this Corporation without nominal or par value.

[624]*624Under date of December 31, 1924, we find the following:

The President then stated that Federal Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation, whose assets and liabilities had been acquired by this Corporation, was called upon to pay its quarterly Dividend on its outstanding Preferred Stock; that the stockholders of Federal Oil Company would, through an exchange of stock, become stockholders of this Corporation; that the Directors of said Company had requested this Corporation to loan it $4,466.00 with which to pay the Dividend due January 1, 1925, * * *.

The books and accounts of the Federal Oil Company were closed as of September 30, 1924, with the following explanation entered in its general journal:

On October 1, 1924, the assets of the Federal Oil Company of Delaware were taken over and liabilities assumed by. Federal Oil Corporation — Virginia—See entries on following' page for final closing.

Some time prior to February 20, 1925, one Pouch, who had marketed some of the preferred stock for the Delaware Company, instituted a proceeding in the courts of Delaware to obtain an injunction against the dissolution of that company and the exchange of its stock for stock of the petitioner. On February 20, 1925, an agreement was entered into between the petitioner and Pouch which provides in part as follows:

The corporation has heretofore acquired all the property and assets of Federal Oil Company (a Delaware corporation hereinafter sometimes called “the Old Company ”) in exchange for 2, 233 shares of the preferred stock of the Corporation of the par value of $100 each, and 50,592 shares of the common stock without par value of the .Corporation. Said preferred and common stock of the Corporation is held in the treasury of the Old Company and the Corporation desires that the Old Company be dissolved and its assets consisting of said stock distributed among the preferred and common stockholders of the Old Company on the basis of 1 share of the preferred stock of the Corporation for each 20 shares of preferred -stock of the Old Company of the par value of $5.00 each, and on the basis of 1 share of common stock of the Corporation for each 20 shares of the common stock of the Old Company.
The stockholders and directors of the Old Company have approved such basis of distribution to the stockholders of the Old Company but have been unable to effect such distribution on account of an action instituted by Pouch in the courts of Delaware entitled “ Potter vs. Federal Oil Company, et al," in which suit an injunction against such distribution had been obtained.
# * £ * * * ⅝
Now, Thekefoke, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements herein contained, the parties hereto hereby-agree as follows:
1. The Corporation agrees that it will not issue, or cause to be issued, any more of its authorized preferred stock than is now outstanding nor dispose of the 10,000 shares already issued and held in the Treasury until the 2,233 shares of its preferred stock to be distributed to the preferred stockholders of the Old Company or such part thereof as shall not have been converted into common stock prior to July 1, 1925, have been purchased, redeemed or retired by the Corporation.
*******
[625]*6253. Pouch agrees that he will cause the action in the courts of Delaware entitled “Potter vs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Park & Tilford v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 348 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Resthaven Memorial Cemetery v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 383 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)
Federal Oil Corp. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 622 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 B.T.A. 622, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-oil-corp-v-commissioner-bta-1931.