Federal Communications Commission v. Radiofone, Inc.

116 S. Ct. 283, 133 L. Ed. 2d 295, 516 U.S. 1301, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 7152, 95 Daily Journal DAR 14520, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8413, 64 U.S.L.W. 3318
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1995
DocketNo. A-368
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 116 S. Ct. 283 (Federal Communications Commission v. Radiofone, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Communications Commission v. Radiofone, Inc., 116 S. Ct. 283, 133 L. Ed. 2d 295, 516 U.S. 1301, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 7152, 95 Daily Journal DAR 14520, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8413, 64 U.S.L.W. 3318 (U.S. 1995).

Opinion

Justice Stevens,

Circuit Justice.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has applied to me in my capacity as Circuit Justice for the Sixth Circuit to vacate a stay entered by the Court of Appeals on October 18,1995. The stay prevented the FCC from taking any action in furtherance of a nationwide auction of a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Apparently, the Court of Appeals feared that completion of the auction would moot a challenge pending before it to FCC regulations that prevent respondent from bidding for 3 of the 493 licenses available. I am persuaded, however, that allowing the national auction to go forward will not defeat the power of the Court of Appeals to grant appropriate relief in the event that respondent overcomes the presumption of validity that supports the FCC regulations and prevails on the merits. I am also persuaded that the harm to the public caused by a nationwide postponement of the auction would outweigh the possible [1302]*1302harm to respondent. I should point out that because respondent has not filed an opposition to the application, my opinion is based on the factual representations in the FCC’s papers.

Accordingly, the application to vacate the stay is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re PS
661 N.E.2d 329 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1996)
Zava Melessi Fanny v. United States
79 F.3d 1148 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Daniel Curtis German
76 F.3d 315 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
State v. Natalcolon
671 A.2d 556 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1996)
United States v. German
Tenth Circuit, 1996
White v. State of Alabama
74 F.3d 1058 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
People v. P.S.
661 N.E.2d 329 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1996)
United States v. Kemi Idowu
74 F.3d 387 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States v. $184,505.01 in U.S. Currency
72 F.3d 1160 (Third Circuit, 1995)
State v. Rosenfeld
540 N.W.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1995)
Harvell v. Blytheville School District 5
71 F.3d 1382 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Richard Jay Clementi
70 F.3d 997 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Taylor v. Cisneros
913 F. Supp. 314 (D. New Jersey, 1995)
United States v. Perez
70 F.3d 345 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S. Ct. 283, 133 L. Ed. 2d 295, 516 U.S. 1301, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 7152, 95 Daily Journal DAR 14520, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8413, 64 U.S.L.W. 3318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-communications-commission-v-radiofone-inc-scotus-1995.