Fayed v. Altshuler

673 So. 2d 579, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1996 WL 271610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fayed v. Altshuler. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7590
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 1996·No. No. 96-0588·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the trial court’s order providing for incarceration because of the absence of a finding that appellant has the present ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). Further, in our view, the record does not support a present ability to pay the purge amount of $18,743.11.

Oh remand the trial court is further directed to clarify whether incarceration was also ordered because of the formation of a professional association, it being error to order incarceration for so forming one unless appellant paid a $10,000 purge.

GUNTHER, C.J., GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fayed v. Altshuler, 673 So. 2d 579, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1996 WL 271610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 579 (Fayed v. Altshuler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. Bowen
471 So. 2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)