Fayed v. Altshuler
Opinion
We reverse that portion of the trial court’s order providing for incarceration because of the absence of a finding that appellant has the present ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). Further, in our view, the record does not support a present ability to pay the purge amount of $18,743.11.
Oh remand the trial court is further directed to clarify whether incarceration was also ordered because of the formation of a professional association, it being error to order incarceration for so forming one unless appellant paid a $10,000 purge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
673 So. 2d 579 (Fayed v. Altshuler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.