Fayed v. Altshuler

673 So. 2d 579, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1996 WL 271610
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 22, 1996
DocketNo. 96-0588
StatusPublished

This text of 673 So. 2d 579 (Fayed v. Altshuler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fayed v. Altshuler, 673 So. 2d 579, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1996 WL 271610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the trial court’s order providing for incarceration because of the absence of a finding that appellant has the present ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). Further, in our view, the record does not support a present ability to pay the purge amount of $18,743.11.

Oh remand the trial court is further directed to clarify whether incarceration was also ordered because of the formation of a professional association, it being error to order incarceration for so forming one unless appellant paid a $10,000 purge.

GUNTHER, C.J., GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowen v. Bowen
471 So. 2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 579, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457, 1996 WL 271610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fayed-v-altshuler-fladistctapp-1996.