Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris

376 U.S. 513
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 4, 1964·No. 57·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris, 376 U.S. 513 (1964).

376 U.S. 513 (Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pratt v. Nelson
2005 UT App 541 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2005)
Sovik v. Healing Network
244 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Tatum v. Philip Morris Inc.
16 F.3d 417 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
McCullough v. Cities Service Co.
676 P.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1984)
Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.
242 N.W.2d 775 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Corn v. Shelton Equipment & Machine Co.
259 F. Supp. 955 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1966)
Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris
377 U.S. 925 (Supreme Court, 1964)