Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.
This text of 273 A.D. 1055 (Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the finding of freedom from contributory negligence on the part of the decedent, Dorothy Roop, is without evidence to support it. She was the owner of the ear in which she was riding and the negligence of its driver is imputed to her. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile bus line negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 1055, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-central-greyhound-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1948.