Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

271 A.D.2d 948

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 948 (Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., 271 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile bus line negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile bus line negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Love, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-central-greyhound-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1947.