Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

271 A.D.2d 948

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 1947·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile bus line negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile bus line negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Love, JJ.

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., 271 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

271 A.D.2d 948 (Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.