Home/New York Court of Appeals/Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

83 N.E.2d 138, 298 N.Y. 721
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1948·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

In each case: Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and the action remitted to that court for determination upon questions *Page 723 of fact there raised (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606), with costs to abide the event, on the ground that in each case the evidence presents questions of fact as to the defendant's negligence, and in the first case as to freedom from contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff's intestate.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND and DYE, JJ. LEWIS and FULD, JJ., dissent in the first case upon the ground that the driver of the automobile was guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law, which was imputed to the plaintiff's intestate. (Gochee v. Wagner, 257 N.Y. 344.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., 83 N.E.2d 138, 298 N.Y. 721 (N.Y. 1948).

83 N.E.2d 138 (Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kleinman v. Frank
34 A.D.2d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Korsak v. Curry Auto Rental, Inc.
11 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Dorothy M. Harshberger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Nelson Harshberger, Deceased v. Associated Transport, Inc., and Floyd Kenneth Spenton, Associated Transport, Inc. v. Dorothy M. Harshberger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Nelson Harshberger, Deceased
282 F.2d 179 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Harshberger v. Associated Transport, Inc.
282 F.2d 179 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.
274 A.D. 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)