Faulkner v. The Citadel
61 F.3d 278, 1995 WL 476557
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 9, 1995
DocketNo. 95-2472
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 61 F.3d 278 (Faulkner v. The Citadel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Faulkner v. The Citadel, 61 F.3d 278, 1995 WL 476557 (4th Cir. 1995).
Opinions
ORDER
The Citadel’s emergency motion for stay pending appeal is denied. Entered by direction of Judge Hall, with the concurrence of Judge Niemeyer. Judge Hamilton would grant the motion for the reasons separately stated in the attached dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Faulkner v. The Citadel
61 F.3d 278 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 F.3d 278, 1995 WL 476557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulkner-v-the-citadel-ca4-1995.