Faulkenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Faulkenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

623 So. 2d 759, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7931, 1993 WL 284668

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 30, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2990

StatusPublished

This text of 623 So. 2d 759 (Faulkenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faulkenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 623 So. 2d 759, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7931, 1993 WL 284668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a final summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Upon a review of the record, we find two genuine issues of material fact that remain unresolved and preclude the entry of summary judgment:

1. Whether State Farm improperly can-celled the Faulkenbergs’ insurance policy for nonpayment of premium; and

2. Whether State Farm is estopped from asserting that the Faulkenbergs’ policy had been cancelled prior to the loss.

See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Boman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 505 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla.1987); Peninsular Life Ins. Co. v. Wade, 425 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI