Faulk v. State

567 So. 2d 554, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7565, 1990 WL 146768
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 8, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2562
StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 554 (Faulk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faulk v. State, 567 So. 2d 554, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7565, 1990 WL 146768 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

We affirm the judgment and sentence entered by the trial court in this case, but . do so without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise the voluntary and intelligent character of his nolo contendere plea, if he so desires, in a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Strong v. State, 555 So.2d 950 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
373 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Strong v. State
555 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 554, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7565, 1990 WL 146768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulk-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.