Faulk v. State
573 So. 2d 199, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 412, 1991 WL 6012
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1991
DocketNo. 90-505
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 573 So. 2d 199 (Faulk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Faulk v. State, 573 So. 2d 199, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 412, 1991 WL 6012 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We affirm the conviction of appellant and certify the same question we certified in Armstrong v. State, 566 So.2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) as being of great public importance.
DOES TRIAL COUNSEL FOR A DEFENDANT WAIVE FOR HIS CLIENT FUTURE OBJECTION TO FAILURE TO GIVE THE FULL AND COMPLETE INITIAL INSTRUCTION ON JUSTIFIABLE AND EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE AS PART OF THE MANSLAUGHTER INSTRUCTION WHEN THE TRIAL ATTORNEY SPECIFICALLY REQUESTS AN ABBREVIATED INSTRUCTION, WHICH OTHERWISE WOULD CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Logan v. State
592 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 199, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 412, 1991 WL 6012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulk-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.