Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

Michigan Supreme Court

Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

726 N.W.2d 17, 477 Mich. 1008

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION. Read the opinion of the Court — 476 Mich. 859 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2007·No. 130996·Published

Opinion

726 N.W.2d 17 (2007)

Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130996. COA No. 257936.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 29, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 31, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

726 N.W.2d 17 (2007)

Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130996. COA No. 257936.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 29, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 31, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, 726 N.W.2d 17, 477 Mich. 1008 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

726 N.W.2d 17 (Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.