Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
726 N.W.2d 17, 477 Mich. 1008
This text of 726 N.W.2d 17 (Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, 726 N.W.2d 17, 477 Mich. 1008 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 31, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 N.W.2d 17, 477 Mich. 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fata-v-roscommon-county-road-commission-mich-2007.