Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
717 N.W.2d 877, 476 Mich. 859
This text of 717 N.W.2d 877 (Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, 717 N.W.2d 877, 476 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Maples
717 N.W.2d 877 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
717 N.W.2d 877, 476 Mich. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fata-v-roscommon-county-road-commission-mich-2006.