Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
717 N.W.2d 877, 476 Mich. 859
Opinion
Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, 717 N.W.2d 877, 476 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).
717 N.W.2d 877 (Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Maples
717 N.W.2d 877 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)