Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering

95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1918
Docket9448
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 1001 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering, 95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Lxjke, J.

1. In an action in trover, where the plaintiff elects to take a money verdict, he, may recover the highest proved value of the converted property between the time of the conversion and the trial, not in excess of the value of the property alleged in the petition. Civil . Code (1910), § 4514.

2. Where title to the property is shown to be in the plaintiff, proof of demand for it by him on the defendant, and of refusal to deliver' by the defendant, makes prima facie a case of conversion.

3. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which was for an amount less than that claimed; and the trial judge has approved the finding of the jury. There is no assignment of error that requires a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eleison Composites, LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.
267 F. App'x 918 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
CHARTER MORTGAGE COMPANY v. Ahouse
300 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Durden v. Durden
197 S.E. 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Greenblatt v. McCurdy
146 S.E. 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-lumber-co-v-pickering-gactapp-1918.