Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering

95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 17, 1918·No. 9448·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lxjke, J.

1. In an action in trover, where the plaintiff elects to take a money verdict, he, may recover the highest proved value of the converted property between the time of the conversion and the trial, not in excess of the value of the property alleged in the petition. Civil . Code (1910), § 4514.

2. Where title to the property is shown to be in the plaintiff, proof of demand for it by him on the defendant, and of refusal to deliver' by the defendant, makes prima facie a case of conversion.

3. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which was for an amount less than that claimed; and the trial judge has approved the finding of the jury. There is no assignment of error that requires a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering, 95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

95 S.E. 1001 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eleison Composites, LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.
267 F. App'x 918 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
CHARTER MORTGAGE COMPANY v. Ahouse
300 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Durden v. Durden
197 S.E. 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Greenblatt v. McCurdy
146 S.E. 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)