Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering
This text of 95 S.E. 1001 (Farrar Lumber Co. v. Pickering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In an action in trover, where the plaintiff elects to take a money verdict, he, may recover the highest proved value of the converted property between the time of the conversion and the trial, not in excess of the value of the property alleged in the petition. Civil . Code (1910), § 4514.
2. Where title to the property is shown to be in the plaintiff, proof of demand for it by him on the defendant, and of refusal to deliver' by the defendant, makes prima facie a case of conversion.
3. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which was for an amount less than that claimed; and the trial judge has approved the finding of the jury. There is no assignment of error that requires a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 1001, 22 Ga. App. 404, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrar-lumber-co-v-pickering-gactapp-1918.