Farr v. Thomson
78 U.S. 139
Opinion
The declaration in this case presented, in all substantial respects, the same state of facts as the declaration in the case just decided. After argument by Mr. M. M. Carpenter,for the plaintiff, no one appearing contra, Mr. Justice Swayne announced the judgment of the court to the effect that the former case decided this. The question certified to the.court — which was whether the declaration showed a sufficient cause of action — was accordingly answered by it
In the affirmative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farr v. Thomson, 78 U.S. 139 (1870).
78 U.S. 139 (Farr v. Thomson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Petters Co.
499 B.R. 342 (D. Minnesota, 2013)
Smith v. Sac County
78 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1871)