Farr v. State

192 S.E.2d 500, 127 Ga. App. 120, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 808
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1972
Docket47222
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 192 S.E.2d 500 (Farr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farr v. State, 192 S.E.2d 500, 127 Ga. App. 120, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 808 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinions

Pannell, Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for larceny of a motor vehicle.

Defendant’s motion for a new trial alleging the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it, decidedly and strongly against the weight of evidence and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity was denied by the trial judge. The indictment charged the defendant with larceny of "a certain Ford farm-type tractor . . . painted blue . . . bearing identification No. C 238767 . . . the property of Ponce de Leon Tractor Company.”

While the tractor recovered bore No. C 238767, the uncontradicted evidence indicates that the missing tractor bore Serial No. C 238769. The identification number having been made a necessary and essential part of the description of the tractor in the indictment to distinguish it from other tractors of like make and color, proof that the serial number of the missing tractor was No. C 238769 constitutes a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Fulford v. State, 50 Ga. 591, 593; Crenshaw v. State, 64 Ga. 449; Robertson v. State, 97 Ga. 206 (22 SE 974); McLendon v. State, 121 Ga. 158 (48 SE 902); Youngblood v. State, 40 Ga. App. 514 (150 SE 457); Mar[121]*121tin v. State, 43 Ga. App. 287 (158 SE 635); Wright v. State, 52 Ga. App. 202 (182 SE 862).

Argued June 5, 1972 Decided September 25, 1972. Alton T. Milam, for appellant. John T. Perren, District Attorney, for appellee.

Additional assignments of error pertain more specifically to the ground that the verdict is strongly against the weight of evidence, the determination of which was within the sound province of the jury, under proper instructions of the trial judge.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian, J., concurs. Hall, P. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
574 S.E.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Caldwell v. State
228 S.E.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Holbrook v. State
199 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Farr v. State
192 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E.2d 500, 127 Ga. App. 120, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farr-v-state-gactapp-1972.