Farnam v. Despard

1 Wend. 287
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 287 (Farnam v. Despard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farnam v. Despard, 1 Wend. 287 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

It was undoubtedly the duty of the attorney to watch bis cause; but it seems the bar generally were misled by the circumstance of criminal cases set down for trial not coming on. Notwithstanding that the inquest was regularly taken, the plaintiff’s attorney ought to have waived it on the offer of the payment of costs. The state of the calendar had not been changed, and there -was every probability that the plaintiff would have had an opportunity to try his cause at that circuit, and such is proved to have been the result, as junior causes were subsequently tried. Under these circumstances, the inquest must be set aside, and to discourage the disposition of making costs, by insisting upon advantages of this kind, the court direct the costs of the circuit and of this motion to abide the event of the suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Post v. Wright
1 Cai. Cas. 111 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farnam-v-despard-nysupct-1828.