Post v. Wright

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 183
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 183 (Post v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Post v. Wright, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 183 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All reasonable notice to attend and defend the suit, was given. The cause was on the day. docket, and there is no kind of excuse why the defendants were absent. They had a counsel in court, and might have been there themselves, with their witnesses. The defendants, therefore, can take nothing by their motion.

N. B. Hoffman urged strongly the rigour of the practice, that it would operate only against the attorney of the defendant, that this was the first instance of such strictness. The court answered, there must be a first time in all proceedings; that they found it necessary to enforce their rules, and had made a determination so to do, as the only mode of having them obeyed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-wright-nysupct-1803.