Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Gaither
3 D.C. 440
This text of 3 D.C. 440 (Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Gaither) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Gaither, 3 D.C. 440 (circtddc 1829).
Opinion
The Court also rejected the set-off of the notes of W. W. Cor-coran & Co., which were offered under the circumstances stated in this ease before the Supreme Court. 1 Peters, 37.
Verdict for the defendant. Bills of exceptions were taken, but no new writ of error prosecuted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gaither v. Farmers & Mechanics Bank of Georgetown Ex Rel. Corcorran
26 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-mechanics-bank-v-gaither-circtddc-1829.