Farmer v. The County of Westchester

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ eK TYRONE FARMER, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 2691 (NSR) JUDGMENT THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, THE CITY OF PEEKSKILL, ERIC JOHANSEN, PAMELA SGROI, JANE OR JOHN DOE ACCESS OFFICER, SGT. HENDERLONG, OFFICER VAZEO, and OFFICER SEAN ECHOLS, Defendants. wa K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 30, 2022, the Court GRANTED the County and the City Defendants’ motions to dismiss and DISMISSED pro se Plaintiff’'s Second Amended Complaint in its entirety without leave to replead. The Court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962), judgement is entered; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 1, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court BY: 3. Soutien Deputy Clerk