Farmer v. Pennington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7362

DEE DEIDRE FARMER; WILLIAM CHERRY, Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

TERRY PENNINGTON, Lieutenant; ROBERT FOX, Unit Manager; J. ROBINSON, Correctional Counselor; JERRY GAUGHAN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-440-5-CT-H)

Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dee Deidre Farmer, William Cherry, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re-

lief on their Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer v. Pennington, No. CA-95-440-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1995). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971).