Farmer v. Pennington

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4157, 1996 WL 4327
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 5, 1996·No. 95-7362·Published

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dee Deidre FARMER; William Cherry, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
Terry PENNINGTON, Lieutenant; Robert Fox, Unit Manager; J.
Robinson, Correctional Counselor; Jerry Gaughan,
Disciplinary Hearing Officer,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7362.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1995
Decided Jan. 5, 1996.

Dee Deidre Farmer, William Cherry, Appellants Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer v. Pennington, No. CA-95-440-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. Pennington, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4157, 1996 WL 4327 (4th Cir. 1996).

73 F.3d 357 (Farmer v. Pennington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related