Farm Industries, Division of the Quaker Oats Co. v. Howell

95 So. 2d 808, 39 Ala. App. 131
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 28, 1957
Docket6 Div. 368
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 So. 2d 808 (Farm Industries, Division of the Quaker Oats Co. v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farm Industries, Division of the Quaker Oats Co. v. Howell, 95 So. 2d 808, 39 Ala. App. 131 (Ala. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

On May 9, 1955, Farm Industries, Division of the Quaker Oats Company brought detinue in the Winston Circuit Court for the recovery in specie of thirty-two hundred pounds of Full-O-Pep broiler feed, consisting of sixty-four bags of fifty pounds each.

After the court had overruled his demurrers, the defendant, Howell, plead not guilty and brought counter suit by way of set-off and recoupment, alleging a contract whereunder Farm Industries bailed some 16,000 chicks with Howell under a “feeding out” agreement whereunder the chicks delivered by Farm Industries to Howell were to remain the property of Farm Industries. Howell was to feed them only Full-O-Pep broiler feed, and upon their being ready for market, he was to be paid a fee and a bonus for the chickens returned alive on a formula involving (1) a bonus for the average weight per fowl varying from 0 to 1/£ cent and (2) a fee scaled to the ratio of feed to delivered bird, which was set in ranges called “feed conversion” rates.

The agreement which was in evidence is as follows:

[133]*133

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamrick v. Daniel
449 So. 2d 1247 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Cavalier Insurance Company v. Gann
329 So. 2d 573 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Thomas v. Ware
204 So. 2d 501 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 2d 808, 39 Ala. App. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farm-industries-division-of-the-quaker-oats-co-v-howell-alactapp-1957.