Farley v. State
This text of 501 So. 2d 105 (Farley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court considered prior out of state convictions in arriving at a sentence under the “guidelines” without same having been properly before the trial court. Baker v. State, 493 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Brooks v. State, 466 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Davis v. State, 463 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Therefore, the appellant’s 3.850 motion was well taken and the denial thereof is reversed and the matter returned to the trial court with directions to vacate the sentence and conduct a new sentencing hearing.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 So. 2d 105, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 303, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.