Farley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farley v. State

490 So. 2d 1078, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1520, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8715

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 9, 1986

DocketNo. 4-86-0856

StatusPublished

This text of 490 So. 2d 1078 (Farley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. State, 490 So. 2d 1078, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1520, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found appellant’s motion for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to be fatally defective as not in compliance with the rule. We affirm. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile at the trial level a motion which complies with the requirements of the rule.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found appellant’s motion for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to be fatally defective as not in compliance with the rule. We affirm. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile at the trial level a motion which complies with the requirements of the rule.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 So. 2d 1078, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1520, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack