Farley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farley v. State

490 So. 2d 1078, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1520, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8715

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 1986·No. No. 4-86-0856·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found appellant’s motion for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to be fatally defective as not in compliance with the rule. We affirm. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile at the trial level a motion which complies with the requirements of the rule.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found appellant’s motion for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to be fatally defective as not in compliance with the rule. We affirm. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile at the trial level a motion which complies with the requirements of the rule.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Farley v. State, 490 So. 2d 1078, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1520, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

490 So. 2d 1078 (Farley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related